In an interesting coincidence, Will and I have been writing about Eva Moskowitz and poverty, and here the NY state test results come along. Success Academy made up 7 out 15 of the top scorers in NY state, according to the NY Post. And while of course poverty level correlated with reading performance, there were the outliers of high poverty schools that outperformed state averages.
But Success Academy was more than just a freak outlier—it blew other schools out of the water, and it did so consistently across multiple schools.
In the NY Daily News, Robert Pondiscio writes in “How Does She Do It?“:
What is imperative now is for serious, unbiased experts and observers to descend on Harlem and figure out how these extraordinary results are being achieved and, if all that glitters is gold, how to replicate them.
It’s worth repeating a challenge I threw out earlier to Eva Moskowitz in a recent post: share the practices, content, and protocols your schools are using so others can benefit. That’s what being a “public” school is all about, right? Collaboration, sharing, learning. That’s what our public system of education should be doing if we’re truly dedicated to improving outcomes for all of our children, and not just some.
As John King also said: “The question becomes, what’s happening in these schools that’s leading to those better outcomes?”
I agree with Pondiscio and King. I genuinely want to know what’s happening at Success Academy. And I want to know from the perspective of a school as an ecosystem. From this perspective, some questions I would ask would be oriented around the main pillars of a strong school community: 1) leadership, 2) content, and 3) environment.
- What do the formal and informal leaders say and do? How and what do they communicate consistently? (This includes student leaders).
- Is the leadership distributed?
- What mechanisms are in place for students, parents, teachers, and leaders to collaborate and receive continuous feedback? How do leaders respond to feedback?
- How is diversity in student ability, knowledge, and skills strategically recognized and cultivated?
- What are the values and vision behind assessment and unit design?
- What texts are taught in ELA? Why?
- How well do topics and themes build knowledge and understanding of academic domains and the world sequentially across classrooms and grades?
- How are students engaged in their community through units?
- What scaffolds and interventions for students who are struggling are applied consistently both in and out of classrooms?
- What opportunities beyond academics are provided for all students?
- What does it feel like when you walk into a Success Academy school? What does it sound like? What does it look like?
- How relevant is posted work and displays to students and their community?
- What is the ratio of positive to negative language used by students and staff in the building?
- How (psychologically) safe do students with special needs feel in the hallways, lunch rooms, and classrooms?
- How are supportive social relationships and networks developed and sustained by the school?
These are just some of the questions I would start with.
I don’t say this to put down what Success Academy has accomplished. Their students deserve our recognition. They’ve worked hard for this.
But what I want to know is whether what Success Academy is doing is truly preparing students for the future, for the long-term.
What is success? And what does it look like? And is what Success Academy doing truly an exemplar?
And more importantly—what does success look like over the long haul?